Kabul: Following grievance over the general public execution of a person, the Taliban on Thursday defended its actions. The Taliban on Thursday termed the worldwide grievance over its public execution “reprehensible” and “interference” in Afghanistan’s inner matters, Voice of America (VOA) News reported.
Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid in a assertion stated that their motion changed into criticised because of a loss of facts approximately Islam and Afghanistan. He pressured that ninety nine according to cent of the human beings in Afghanistan are Muslim. Mujahid’s assertion comes after US and United Nations criticised the Taliban for the general public execution of a person.
Zabihullah Mujahid stated that they’ve made many sacrifices for implementing Islamic legal guidelines in Afghanistan. Defending the general public execution, Zabihullah Mujahid stated that dying consequences are “given everywhere in the world,” which includes America and Europe, as according to the VOA News report.
“The reality that Afghanistan is being criticized for making use of Islamic sentences suggests that a few nations and groups have both inadequate understanding or have troubles with Islam, respecting Muslims’ ideals and legal guidelines,” VOA News quoted Zabihullah Mujahid as saying.
“This motion is an interference withinside the inner affairs of nations and is reprehensible,” he added.
On Thursday, the Taliban Supreme Court introduced the general public flogging of 27 convicts, which includes 9 women, in Parwan province. The choice of the Taliban Supreme Court comes an afternoon after publicly executing a person charged with homicide for the primary time considering the fact that they took over Afghanistan ultimate year.
Taliban’s spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid had showed the general public execution of a person. Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid stated that the execution came about in a sports activities stadium in western Farah province on Wednesday, consistent with VOA News report. He stated that masses of human beings witnessed the execution, which includes the pinnacle officers of the group, as according to the VOA News report.
Zabihullah Mujahid stated that the accomplished individual changed into attempted withinside the Taliban courts and next appellate tribunals. He claimed that the accomplished individual withinside the courtroom docket had “confessed to stabbing to dying” a resident of Farah and stealing his belongings, which includes a motorcycle. According to the spokesperson, the execution changed into performed through the victim’s father.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) spokesperson Jeremy Laurence in a assertion stated, “The dying penalty is incompatible with essential tenets of human rights, and its use can’t be reconciled with complete admire for the proper to life.” Lawrence known as at the Taliban to create a direct moratorium on any similarly executions, and act unexpectedly to prohibit the usage of the dying penalty.
The UN Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) echoed the message on social media. It tweeted, “Afghanistan’s de facto government introduced the general public execution of a person in Farah province today. The UN strongly opposes the dying penalty in all circumstances, and calls on de facto government to set up on the spot moratorium if you want to abolishing the dying penalty.”
Meanwhile, the USA additionally criticised the Taliban after reviews concerning public execution emerged. US State Department Spokesperson Ned Price stated, “We’ve visible the reviews that the Taliban has ordered judges to impose their interpretation of Sharia law. That consists of public executions; it consists of amputations; it consists of floggings.”
While addressing a press briefing, Ned Price stated, “We’ve visible despicable movies which have circulated on line in current days concerning a number of those tactics. This shows to us that the Taliban are trying to find to go back to their regressive and abusive practices of the 1990s. It changed into an affront to the glory and the human rights of all Afghans then; it’d be an affront to the glory and the human rights of all Afghans now.”